Home > Fail, Honesty, Integrity, Plagiarism, Twitter, Warcraft > Honesty and Integrity in an Electronic Age: Source Citing

Honesty and Integrity in an Electronic Age: Source Citing

November 13, 2011 Leave a comment Go to comments

Honesty and integrity–two things that go hand in hand in almost any industry. From Wikipedia’s analysis of Honesty:

Honesty refers to a facet of moral character and denotes positive, virtuous attributes such as integrity, truthfulness, and straightforwardness along with the absence of lying, cheating, or theft.

It is no misunderstanding that the WoW Twitter community is a tight knit group of creative energy; the home of bloggers, artists, fanatics, casuals, veterans, and new players. Like any community, they band together in times of crisis, working together to overcome challenges presented to them. They are strong, stubborn, passionate, and driven in their endeavors–they aren’t afraid to stand for what they believe in and make their voices heard.

Recently, one of our own has come under fire–not by her own doing, but by acts perpetrated against her. Liala, the creative force behind Disciplinary Action, has always been a face in the WoW community; her comics and art have been featured across the web and she is known for her humor and passion for the game we all know and love. The discovery that her art was being passed off by someone else, as their own, as they pandered for commissions, was a complete insult to the generosity that Liala has bestowed upon the WoW community. She has created an entire Stained Class art series, in addition to capturing the WoW classes as Twitter icons, only requesting at the bottom of their respective pages to feel free to use these pieces for any non-profit, credited use. A simple request in anyone’s eyes when you consider the time and effort she exerted on their development.

But her simple request could not be abided by. MissPandora (@PandoraTGN) posted several videos on YouTube, each featuring artwork from individuals in the WoW community, and not crediting the creators for their efforts. Instead, she attempts to explain her “vision” from the pieces, in an attempt to pass the artwork off as her own. Five videos were posted and can be found at the following links:

Editor’s Note: As I wrote this, every video was made private in quick succession. The only copy still available was the annotated copy appearing in the header, created by Rades pointing out the fallacies in Pandora’s enterprising adventure.

True to my nature, I jumped in head first to this interesting debacle that was unfolding across the WoW community, getting awareness raised by the WoW Twitter community, and even garnering support from WoW bloggers such as WoW Insider staff. As I watched my feed fly by on Friday (and again heat up today), I wondered if there was an educational avenue that could be pursued as the dust settled.

As a student, source citing was always a fine line that you walked between your own thoughts and creations, and the copying of another’s. There were rules in place  and guides to follow (for a period of time I had MLA memorized) should you ever need to address that gray area of source citing.

As a writer, I always was very careful to make sure my ideas were conveyed as my own, and if I was unsure, I was always quick to cite a source to cover my backside.

As an editor, I told my writers they had better have the best source book of quotes on the planet. To protect themselves, the publication they were writing for, and for me. I can protect myself by following the standards of the industry; is was my responsibility as an editor to make sure those rules were followed.

So how do you make sure to not fall into this questionable gray area of source citing? Let’s take a moment and address the common blog!

  • Do you have art sprinkled through your posts? Is it your own? If it’s not, have you checked with the artist for permission to use their work? This can be addressed on a Deviant Art page (artists are known to explain their stance on the use of their artwork on their landing page or on specific pieces), a DM to the artist on Twitter (if you are mutual follower), or even an IM or email if you have that communication ability. Have you identified the artist in the caption or in the text of your post?

Much of the art used in my posts has been generated by me, or by friends. Before I share anything on Twitter, or even use it in a blog post, I explicitly ask the creator for their approval for me to share their art. Much of the art that I have used were gifts to me–some of the art may be featured by the artist on their own personal blogs, and in some cases, they will never share it beyond gifting it to me. Asking for permission is a sign of respect to the creator, and it’s just the polite thing to do!

  • Have you perpetuated an idea that was developed by another blogger?

To me this is just my standard writing style–if I was to begin writing letters in the mindset of an NPC, I would credit Rades with this creative endeavor, as he is the well-known creator of Letters of a Shattered World. Are you participating in a “____ Circle” answering questions about your playstyle? Are you participating in a blogging challenge such as Spellbound’s 20 Days of WoW Blogging? All of these were created by someone who wasn’t yourself. Take a moment to link back to their blog and highlight their efforts for driving engagement within the community.

Understand that it’s better to over-cite than under-cite your sources in the current age. While I was composing this post, I discovered this little post from Daily Blog Tips called Put Honesty and Integrity Above Everything Else. Don’t sell your reputation short. As Pandora has learned, the community is quick to question one’s reputation who are passing others work off as their own.

Don’t make the same mistake Pandora has. This is an opportunity for the community to check themselves and educate others so the same mistake (or gross negligence) doesn’t occur again.

Editor’s Note: Since Pandora has remained silent on the matter, I offer up this blog as a chance to let her speak her piece and to give herself a voice to the criticism that has been laid in front of her. I moderate my comments, but if you would like to defend yourself on a public platform, I will provide the vehicle. As an editor and a professional, it is always fair to hear both sides of the story. –Miri

About these ads
  1. Disciplinary Action
    November 13, 2011 at 5:40 pm | #1

    A great summation of the whole debacle. I’m so pleased you shared your professional insights on the issue; so much good has come out of this tiresome ordeal, including renewed dedication to correctly attributing source material to the talented members of this wonderful community we share.

    • November 13, 2011 at 5:46 pm | #2

      It’s unfortunate that the education had to come in this fashion though. You have been nothing but stellar in handling the hand you’ve been dealt here, and your professionalism is evident in your attempts to correct the situation. I hope that you see swift resolution from YouTube, TGNtv, and Pandora and the correct acknowledgement for the efforts you have put forth for the WoW community. We support you 100% and we’ll always have the best interests of each community contributor at heart!

  2. Nandi
    November 13, 2011 at 7:49 pm | #3

    I find it somewhat interesting that the tanking survey you linked about tanking has been bouncing around the blogosphere for at least two years.

    http://rhida.ch/2009/11/04/how-do-i-tank/

    • November 13, 2011 at 8:51 pm | #4

      I also find it interesting that you found Rhi’s 2009 version of the document, as he’s done an updated one in 2011 that can be found here: http://rhida.ch/2011/07/14/tanking-circle-questionnaire/ – Which ties back to the one I did. The originator of the current incarnation was Orv (http://dethetank.blogspot.com/), who drafted a tanking version off of a healing circle that had been going around.

      But I’m not quite sure what this has to do with anything? I was tagged to a document challenge, and I participated in the version I was handed. I credited the creator of the version I did, so, help me understand where this is going.

  3. November 20, 2011 at 12:52 am | #5

    Hi Miri:

    I followed you on Twitter and came across this post.

    I am also an artist/writer who is fairly new to the blogging community. I agree with what you have said in your article that people must cite their sources especially when it comes to borrowing ideas, or copying someone else’s work. This was drilled into my head during my years in art college- that if you cannot cite something, your credibility gets ruined, whether it is an article or a piece of art work.

    Also seeing some people get kicked out of school because they plagiarised something was a very strong deterrent for me to do the same thing. It’s no different than the real world where your professional integrity and reputation is at stake. It is not worth the risk of coming under fire by an entire community who can also discredit you.

    She could have just asked the artist if she could borrow her ideas, and do her own original work based on those ideas. Then, said, “These were done by me, but the original artist’s work can be found here, and this was where I got the ideas from.” Thus, this could have easily been avoided. It’s unfortunate and a shame. Let this be a lesson for everyone to learn: Don’t plagiarise and cite your sources!

  1. November 13, 2011 at 7:18 pm | #1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 994 other followers

%d bloggers like this: